A Show / A Public Conversation / A Participatory Civic Planning Adventure

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

Environmental Psychology: A Primer

from what i'm reading this is a relatively new field...here's some definitions. it's long and a little science-y, but super interesting:

Environmental psychology examines the interrelationship between environments and human behavior. The field defines the term environment very broadly including all that is natural on the planet as well as social settings, built environments, learning environments and informational environments. When solving problems involving human-environment interactions, whether global or local, one must have a model of human nature that predicts the environmental conditions under which humans will behave in a decent and creative manner. With such a model one can design, manage, protect and/or restore environments that enhance reasonable behavior, predict what the likely outcome will be when these conditions are not met, and diagnose problem situations. The field develops such a model of human nature while retaining a broad and inherently multidisciplinary focus. It explores such dissimilar issues as common property resource management, wayfinding in complex settings, the effect of environmental stress on human performance, the characteristics of restorative environments, human information processing, and the promotion of durable conservation behavior. The field of environmental psychology recognizes the need to be problem-oriented, using, as needed, the theories and methods of related disciplines (e.g., psychology, sociology, anthropology, biology, ecology). The field founded the Environmental Design Research Association (EDRA), publishes in numerous journals including Environment and Behavior and the Journal of Environmental Psychology, and was reviewed several times in the Annual Review of Psychology. A handbook of the field was published in 1987 (Stokols and Altman 1987).

There are several recurrent elements in the research literature that help to define this relatively new field. Understanding human behavior starts with understanding how people notice the environment. This includes at least two kinds of stimuli: those that involuntarily, even distractingly, command human notice, as well as those places, things or ideas to which humans must voluntarily, and with some effort (and resulting fatigue), direct their awareness. Restoring and enhancing people's capacity to voluntarily direct their attention is a major factor in maintaining human effectiveness.

Perception and cognitive maps - How people image the natural and built environment has been an interest of this field from its beginning. Information is stored in the brain as spatial networks called cognitive maps. These structures link one's recall of experiences with perception of present events, ideas and emotions. It is through these neural networks that humans know and think about the environment, plan and carry out their plans. Interestingly, what humans know about an environment is both more than external reality in that they perceive with prior knowledge and expectations, and less than external reality in that they record only a portion of the entire visual frame yet recall it as complete and continuous.

Preferred environments - People tend to seek out places where they feel competent and confident, places where they can make sense of the environment while also being engaged with it. Research has expanded the notion of preference to include coherence (a sense that things in the environment hang together) and legibility (the inference that one can explore an environment without becoming lost) as contributors to environmental comprehension. Being involved and wanting to explore an environment requires that it have complexity (containing enough variety to make it worth learning about) and mystery (the prospect of gaining more information about an environment). Preserving, restoring and creating a preferred environment is thought to increase sense of well being and behavioral effectiveness in humans.

Environmental stress and coping - Along with the common environmental stressors (e.g., noise, climatic extremes) some define stress as the failure of preference, including in the definition such cognitive stressors as prolonged uncertainty, lack of predictability and stimulus overload. Research has identified numerous behavioral and cognitive outcomes including physical illness, diminished altruism, helplessness and attentional fatigue. Coping with stress involves a number of options. Humans can change their physical or social settings to create more supportive environments (e.g., smaller scaled settings, territories) where they can manage the flow of information or stress inducing stimuli. People can also endure the stressful period, incurring mental costs that they deal with later, in restorative settings (e.g., natural areas, privacy, solitude). They can also seek to interpret or make sense of a situation as a way to defuse its stressful effects, often sharing these interpretations as a part of their culture.

Participation - The field is committed to enhancing citizen involvement in environmental design, management and restoration efforts. It is concerned not only with promoting citizen comprehension of environmental issues but with insuring their early and genuine participation in the design, modification and management of environments.

Conservation behavior - The field has also played a major role in bringing psychological knowledge to bear upon the issue of developing an ecologically sustainable society. It explores environmental attitudes, perceptions and values as well as devise intervention techniques for promoting environmentally appropriate behavior.

Scope
Although "environmental psychology" is arguably the best-known and more comprehensive description of the field, it is also known as environmental social sciences, architectural psychology, socio-architecture, ecological psychology, ecopsychology, behavioral geography, environment-behavior studies, person-environment studies, environmental sociology, social ecology, and environmental design research; each advanced by different researchers, sometimes used interchangeably, sometimes with recognized gaps and overlaps between the terms. This multidisciplinary field draws on work in a number of disciplines including anthropology, geography, ekistics, sociology, psychology, history, political science, engineering, planning, architecture, urban design and, of course, aesthetics.

The varied names for the field accurately reflect an ongoing debate about its proper scope, for example, whether or not it includes study of human interaction with the natural environment. "Environmental design" is generally understood to describe design activities focused on the natural environment and sustainability as well as concern with the planned environment which humans build - the "artificial" or designed physical environment - and its ability to meet community needs. Only a small portion of the built environment is attributable to architects, so a focus on "architectural psychology" is seen as too narrow. Generally speaking, individuals associated with the field are interested in better understanding the relationships between people and their environments so that this knowledge can be applied to problematic real-world situations.

Proxemics
In the mid 1950s anthropologist E. T. Hall wrote "The Hidden Dimension" which developed and popularized the concepts of personal space and his more general name for this field, proxemics. He defined proxemics as, ". . . the study of how man unconsciously structures microspace - the distance between men in the conduct of daily transactions, the organization of space in his houses and buildings, and ultimately the layout of his towns."
Hall defined and measured four interpersonal "zones":
. intimate (0 to 18 inches)
. personal (18 inches to 4 feet)
. social (4 feet to 12 feet)
. public (12 feet and beyond)
In "The Hidden Dimension" he famously observed that the precise distance we feel 'comfortable' with other people being near us is culturally determined: Saudis, Norwegians, Milanese and Japanese will have differing notions of 'close'. In one of his best known empirical studies, Hall carried out an analysis of employee reactions to Eero Saarinen's last work, the John Deere World Headquarters Building.

Impact on the Built Environment
Ultimately, environmental psychology is oriented towards influencing the work of design professionals (architects, engineers, interior designers, urban planners, etc.) and thereby improving the human environment.
On a civic scale, efforts towards improving pedestrian landscapes have paid off to some extent, involving figures like Jane Jacobs and Copenhagen's Jan Gehl. One prime figure here is the late writer and researcher William H. Whyte and his still-refreshing and perceptive "City", based on his accumulated observations of skilled Manhattan pedestrians, steps, and patterns of use in urban plazas.

No equivalent organized knowledge of environmental psychology has developed out of architecture. Most prominent American architects, led until recently by Philip Johnson who was very strong on this point, view their job as an art form. They see little or no responsibility for the social or functional impact of their designs, which was highlighted with failure of public high-rise housing like Pruitt Igoe.

Environmental psychology has conquered one whole architectural genre, although it's a bitter victory: retail stores, and any other commercial venue where the power to manipulate the mood and behavior of customers, places like stadiums, casinos, malls, and now airports. From Philip Kotler's landmark paper on Atmospherics and Alan Hirsch's "Effects of Ambient Odors on Slot-Machine Usage in a Las Vegas Casino", through the creation and management of the Gruen transfer, retail relies heavily on psychology, original research, focus groups, and direct observation. One of William Whyte's students, Paco Underhill, makes a living as a "shopping anthropologist". Most of this most-advanced research remains a trade secret and proprietary.

Density and Crowding
As environmental psychologists have theorized that density and crowding can have an adverse effect on mood and even cause stress-related illness. Accordingly, environmental and architectural designs could be adapted to minimize the effects of crowding in situations when crowding cannot be avoided. Factors that reduce feelings of crowding within buildings include:
. Windows, particularly openable ones, and ones that provide a view as well as light
. High ceilings
. Doors to divide spaces (Baum and Davies) and provide access control
. Room shape: square rooms feel less crowded than rectangular ones (Dresor)
. Using partitions to create smaller, personalized spaces within an open plan office or larger work space.
. Providing increases in cognitive control over aspects of the internal environment, such as ventilation, light, privacy, etc.
. Conducting a cognitive appraisal of an environment and feelings of crowding in different settings. For example, one might be comfortable with crowding at a concert but not in school corridors.
. Creating a defensible space (Calhoun)

Noise
Noise increases environmental stress. Although it has been found that control and predictability are the greatest factors in stressful effects of noise; context, pitch, source and habituation are also important variables [1].

Personal Space and Territory
Having an area of personal territory in a public space e.g. at the office is a key feature of many architectural designs. Having such a 'defensible space' (term coined by Calhoun during his experiment on rats) can reduce the negative effects of crowding in urban environments. Creation of personal space is achieved by placing barriers and personalising the space, for example using pictures of one's family. This increases cognitive control as one sees oneself as having control over the entrants to the personal space and therefore able to control the level of density and crowding in the space.

Environmental Cognition
Environmental cognition (involved in human cognition) plays a crucial role in environmental perception. The orbitofrontal cortex in the brain plays a role in environmental judgment.

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Our evening at Redmoon Theater

...was a blast, and gave us alot to think about

Angela Tillges and Redmoon were incredibly generous

I encourage everyone who was there to post about,
in particular
content, process and form experiences from the evening

thank you, Angie
more to come here soon...

Monday, April 28, 2008

Bill Savage took us on a tour of Rogers Park

and it was cold
and, it was super interesting.

I'm going to ask two questions here
and i'd like you to comment on this post with any thoughts you have-

1)
Bill has a strong point of view. What did his home and the tour he gave us tell us about his values? What's important to him in terms of space, in terms of history, in terms of place?

2)
Bill has a strong point of view. Everything he showed us and told us is framed by that point of view. To quote him, what was missing? What stories, what perspectives, what questions were left out? What did the tour leave you wondering about around the edges, and on other sides of what he shared?

We don't get to really debrief this night until wednesday...
So if you can, use these prompts to do some thinking, and some writing.
let's get down some thoughts before they become- the thing we did before we did the redmoon workshop.

more audience engagement/participation

An idea I was thinking about in terms of the show's participatory nature is the question of - how does an audience know when it is okay to participate, when they are not expected to, when they are invited to and when they can but shouldn't feel as though they have to?

I think these questions relate to communities as well, maybe? When does a citizen feel that participating expected? Must they be invited? What level of participation does one commit to by taking on certain responsibilities? By participating in the Built event, what is an audience member committing to in terms of participation?
Just some thoughts..

Sunday, April 27, 2008

A good weekend.

Sunday April 27th

We had a great weekend of rehearsal…
Lots of exploration of main themes, and continuing to explore how our event will combine performance and participation…

Some core questions we talked about today, as we hone in on the specific content that we’ll center material around…

Who makes decisions?
Who has the power to make decisions?

How do the words we use in this conversation get defined?

What do people want?
…We mostly see our own values as just and right…we assign our motivations and wants positive value in the world, so when different value systems want different things (or the same place), what happens…?

What do our actions and values reveal about each of us in relation to space?

In relation to community?

Who are you responsible for?

How many dreams can a community hold?

How many places can one space be?
(keeping in mind Bill Savage’s equation-
Space plus Values = Place)

Who do you trust?

What would you like to see changed?

What do you fear will be changed?

We also talked about the nature of participation that we might set up in our events, and the choices we need to make in relation to the activities we build into BUILT (no pun intended).

Fiction or Task-Based Activity
Does an activity ask participants to pretend something, to exist in an imagined circumstance (like play characters in a fictional zoning meeting), or is it an action people actually do from where they are, and who they are?

Private or Public Nature
Is an activity one which people do on their own, in the company of others, or does it demand they publicly engage, or state something about themselves…what is their level of exposure, or vulnerability in the room?

Dialogue or Voicing
Is it about the experience of listening and pushing each other, of engaging, or is it about everyone voicing their own perspective and simply being heard?

Deepening or Broadening
Is it about digging into values, into an issue and its complexity, or is it about getting at the breadth of the issue, and building awareness by expanding the conversation?

Tomorrow, we take a tour of Rogers Park with Bill Savage…

Saturday, April 26, 2008

experts

i feel like a big challenge with this project
something that's important, and a great learning opportunity for us
is how to create spaces and opportunities for an exciting meaningful conversation that include 'experts' and'non-experts'...

How do you set up activities and interactions that allow a trained urban planner, a real estate developer, a renter, and a 16 year old student to all contribute from their own place of experience and knowledge, but also create a landscape for discourse that moves beyond- i share my story, you share yours...that moves to engagement?

How do we engage in ethical, moral, values-based dialogue that makes listening not only the respectful thing to do, but a neccessary action to actually achieve the task at hand?

What is the task at hand, amidst a desire for civic inquiry (a step before social action, perhaps) that offers us the chance for successful events and authentic participation?

Monday, April 21, 2008

Sunday night, in rehearsal
we prepared to connect with potential collaborators/resource partners in the community...
groups of students talked about who in the community we want to learn from, to create a useful and dynamic public conversation about community, housing, vision, and growth...

some things that came up to keep in mind as we begin connecting with folks included
asking people-
What would you like people to wrestle with?
What would be a multi-perspective conversation you would like to hear about your these issue, and in particular the issues you/your organization/your business deal with?
What are the misperceptions of these issues?
What never gets talked about?
What do you wish people talked about?

To make this of value to you, to make it interesting to you,
what do we need to problematize?

Sunday, April 20, 2008

moving ahead

we had a great first week of rehearsal

we have an exciting conversation going on at
nocaptionneeded.com
we have a facebook site
and guest artists are starting to arrive today

join the conversation
help us think expansively about this stuff...

below, some thoughts from rehearsal the other day-

Assumption/generalizations at work here, but for the sake of observing what values come out in our work, at least the other night-

When change was social/human,
the anti-change character was seen as the antagonist
OR
When a lesbian couple tries to move into a neighborhood,
and someone is against that change in the social values of what is ‘appropriate’, and what isn’t,
the person against that change
is the ‘bad guy’.

But

When there was capital/money-based change,
the anti-change person was seen as the protagonist
Or
When someone is trying to buy up property,
or a neighborhood is changing and becoming economically more solvent,
property values are perhaps going up,
The person against that change, not selling, advocating for community not shifting,
is the ‘good guy’…

……

When you don’t know, as a character, that you’re engaged in a battle
but the audience knows that because of your values, you’re actually in a battle
what does that make the experience like to watch? And, to play?

……

What kind of bridges or coming-together or shared values can vastly different stories have?
Sometimes a conflict arises because of differing values, although no one is consciously trying to be malicious…

……

Why do we value nostalgia?

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

Forgotten Chicago

Here is the link to the site that was discussed during Bill Savage's talk yesterday. Didn't want it to get grouped in with the research links, because I feel like its different.

http://www.forgottenchicago.com/index.php



and the article that discusses it

Wednesday, April 9, 2008

Today we start the conversation

We're starting a conversation about cities, change, development and housing.

We're wanting to learn from people with different experiences and point of views.

We're interested in conversations that include, and then expand from, the personal stories, politics and perspectives...what are the ethics involved in figuring out/living amidst change?

Equity. Vision. Home.
The United States will increase by around 100 million people in the next 20-30 years. There is no one plan for where we will all live.
Where will we live? Will we be thoughtful about that, or will it just happen?

This blog is a space that students, collaborators and partners can and hopefully will post links, images & thoughts...its not an advocacy site for a specific activist agenda- its ideally a space for hearing, thinking and sharing.

Attacks will be deleted. Tension and disagreement won't.