An idea I was thinking about in terms of the show's participatory nature is the question of - how does an audience know when it is okay to participate, when they are not expected to, when they are invited to and when they can but shouldn't feel as though they have to?
I think these questions relate to communities as well, maybe? When does a citizen feel that participating expected? Must they be invited? What level of participation does one commit to by taking on certain responsibilities? By participating in the Built event, what is an audience member committing to in terms of participation?
Just some thoughts..
A Show / A Public Conversation / A Participatory Civic Planning Adventure
interesting links and articles
- Pica Blog Response to BUILT
- BUILT Review from The Oregonian
- Radio interview with Michael Rohd about BUILT
- Portland as a bubble? Article...
- BUILT PRODUCTION BLOG
- Brief cellphone video from our Hartford performance/civic event with Hartbeat Ensemble at City Hall in Hartford, CT on June 10, 2008
- Cabrini Green residents and the Chicago "Plan"
- Gentrification and "Upzoning" in the City
- Homelessness in Portland- Mercury Blog post, and comments
- List of dozens of recent articles that pertain to mixed-income housing, the Plan for Transformation, and the displacement that resulted from this plan
- LISTEN: public housing/gentrification panel
- michael rakowitz interview...
- NPR story on BUILT events in Hartford
- Portland SOWA Artist-In-Residence program
- TBA Festival in Portland
- urban to suburban migration- culture and tension
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I think "inviting" in community is an intriguing idea. Do we "invite" people to participate in their lives; in the building of 'habitat' (for humanity) homes; in dialoguing about their own stories of 'home' and safety, violence, urban dwelling? How does one learn autonomous participation?
Post a Comment